In this article, the authors examine recent judicial and administrative developments related to the “subject-to-tax” exception of state addback statutes and present avenues for potential challenge.
Critiquing the ‘Subject-to-Tax’ Exception via Recent Authority
By Jane Wells May on May 19, 2016
Jane Wells MayJane Wells May focuses her practice on state and local tax matters. She represents businesses in connection with tax controversies at the audit, administrative and judicial levels around the United States. Her clients include companies in manufacturing, retailing, pharmaceuticals, financial services, agribusiness, food and beverage, health care, energy, technology and insurance industries. Jane heads the Firm's State & Local Tax Practice and sits on the Firm's Executive, Management and Compensation Committees. Read Jane Wells May's full bio.
Related Posts
- While Virginia Supreme Court Holds “Subject-To-Tax” Means “Actually Taxed,” Determination of “Actually Taxed” is Relatively Broad for Purposes of Addback Exception
- Nebraska District Court Holds That GIL 24-19-1 is Not Afforded Deference
- US Treasury Issues Guidance on the ARPA Claw-Back Provision
- The US Department of the Treasury Says State IRC Conformity Bills Do Not Trigger Federal Relief Claw-Back Provision
- McDermott Provides Treasury Department with Concrete Suggestions for Guidance on the American Rescue Plan Act’s Claw-Back Provision
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Maryland Comptroller Adopts Digital Advertising Gross Revenues Tax Regulations
- Massachusetts Department of Revenue Stops Applying COVID-19 Telecommuting Policy, Returns to Location of Work Performed
- Illinois Enacts Pass-Through Entity Tax to Help Partners and S Corporation Shareholders Avoid the $10,000 SALT Cap
- Texas Comptroller Announces Medical or Dental Billing Services are Not Taxable, Effective Immediately
- Nebraska District Court Holds That GIL 24-19-1 is Not Afforded Deference
