In this article, the authors examine recent judicial and administrative developments related to the “subject-to-tax” exception of state addback statutes and present avenues for potential challenge.
Critiquing the ‘Subject-to-Tax’ Exception via Recent Authority
By Jane Wells May on May 19, 2016
Jane Wells MayJane Wells May focuses her practice on state and local tax matters. She represents businesses in connection with tax controversies at the audit, administrative and judicial levels around the United States. Her clients include companies in manufacturing, retailing, pharmaceuticals, financial services, agribusiness, food and beverage, health care, energy, technology and insurance industries. Jane heads the Firm's State & Local Tax Practice and sits on the Firm's Executive, Management and Compensation Committees. Read Jane Wells May's full bio.
Related Posts
- While Virginia Supreme Court Holds “Subject-To-Tax” Means “Actually Taxed,” Determination of “Actually Taxed” is Relatively Broad for Purposes of Addback Exception
- As Minnesota Moves Toward GILTI Taxation, New Jersey May Be Moving Away from It
- Be Careful What You Wish For: Minnesota May Be on the Precipice of Enacting Worldwide Combined Reporting at the Worst Possible Time
- Tax That DC?!?! FCA Suit on Residency Brings Business Intelligence Company into the Crosshairs
- Nebraska District Court Holds That GIL 24-19-1 is Not Afforded Deference
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Maryland Ad Tax Denials Coming: Are You Ready for Tax Court?
- At the 10-Yard Line: New York Formally Proposes Corporate Tax Reform Regulations
- OTA Finds CDTFA’s Audit Methodology Arbitrary
- As Minnesota Moves Toward GILTI Taxation, New Jersey May Be Moving Away from It
- Buehler Doesn’t Get a Day Off from Double Taxation
