In this article, the authors examine recent judicial and administrative developments related to the “subject-to-tax” exception of state addback statutes and present avenues for potential challenge.
Critiquing the ‘Subject-to-Tax’ Exception via Recent Authority
By Jane Wells May on May 19, 2016
Jane Wells MayJane Wells May focuses her practice on state and local tax matters. She represents businesses in connection with tax controversies at the audit, administrative and judicial levels around the United States. Her clients include companies in manufacturing, retailing, pharmaceuticals, financial services, agribusiness, food and beverage, health care, energy, technology and insurance industries. Jane heads the Firm's State & Local Tax Practice and sits on the Firm's Executive, Management and Compensation Committees. Read Jane Wells May's full bio.
Related Posts
- While Virginia Supreme Court Holds “Subject-To-Tax” Means “Actually Taxed,” Determination of “Actually Taxed” is Relatively Broad for Purposes of Addback Exception
- Nebraska District Court Holds That GIL 24-19-1 is Not Afforded Deference
- US Treasury Issues Guidance on the ARPA Claw-Back Provision
- The US Department of the Treasury Says State IRC Conformity Bills Do Not Trigger Federal Relief Claw-Back Provision
- McDermott Provides Treasury Department with Concrete Suggestions for Guidance on the American Rescue Plan Act’s Claw-Back Provision
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- State False Claims Acts: “Knowing” Why They Matter for Tax Professionals
- Maryland Attorney General’s Office Says Taxpayers May Inform Customers of Increased Charges Resulting from Digital Advertising Tax
- New York State Department Intends to Finalize Corporate Tax Regulations This Fall
- Washington State Capital Gains Tax Held Unconstitutional
- CDTFA Proposes Significant Revisions to Chapters 4 and 13 of the Sales Tax Audit Manual
