In this article, McDermott partner Arthur R. Rosen interviews Art Rosen, whom he claims to “know quite well,” about vexing state tax litigation. One instance that he found troubling came after he and two other taxpayer representatives presented their explanation of a case during a settlement hearing, only to have a Department of Revenue representative respond that they weren’t there to discuss the issues!
Taxation Vexation
By Arthur R. Rosen on February 17, 2015
Posted In Nationwide Importance, Transaction Taxes
Arthur R. RosenArthur R. Rosen focuses his practice on tax planning and litigation relating to state and local tax matters for corporations, partnerships and individuals. Formerly the deputy counsel of the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance, as well as counsel to the governor's Temporary Sales Tax Commission and tax counsel to the New York State Senate Tax Committee, Arthur has also held executive tax management positions at Xerox Corporation and AT&T. He has worked in accounting and law firms in New York City. Read Arthur Rosen's full bio.
Related Posts
- Is California Picking the Pockets of Other States?
- New Mexico Proposes Regulations Addressing Gross Receipts Tax Treatment of Digital Advertising Services
- Massachusetts Department of Revenue Stops Applying COVID-19 Telecommuting Policy, Returns to Location of Work Performed
- US Treasury Issues Guidance on the ARPA Claw-Back Provision
- The US Department of the Treasury Says State IRC Conformity Bills Do Not Trigger Federal Relief Claw-Back Provision
BLOG EDITORS
STAY CONNECTED
TOPICS
ARCHIVES
RECENT POSTS
- Maryland Ad Tax Denials Coming: Are You Ready for Tax Court?
- At the 10-Yard Line: New York Formally Proposes Corporate Tax Reform Regulations
- OTA Finds CDTFA’s Audit Methodology Arbitrary
- As Minnesota Moves Toward GILTI Taxation, New Jersey May Be Moving Away from It
- Buehler Doesn’t Get a Day Off from Double Taxation
